Asia Archives

A Shiny Example

SLV has had a nice run since breaking north of $30 in the middle of February. That is not news but a checkable fact. For those investors who noticed that SLV was at the top of their rankings since July 12th of last year (when SLV closed at $17.62), it was a good opportunity to make money in a relatively non-correlated asset class. The only time it got sticky was at the beginning of this year when the price corrected.

The reason that we bring this up is not to brag. While SLV has done well, other investments that have made it into the top rankings have fared less well. The point is that most of those investments were eventually replaced by new market movers while SLV has hung in at the top of the lists despite the 10% correction that we saw in January. While we may have worried in these posts that the rerating between Gold and Silver may have run most of its course, the System kept pointing out that there was strong momentum behind the asset and that there were not that many more promising assets out there at the weekly measurement points.

My only slight regret…not swapping GLD for SLV a few weeks back when I was adjusting my Seeking Alpha ETF Portfolio. I would have looked very clever. But, in calmer moments, I realize that the regret and the emotion behind that regret is precisely why one should use an unemotional system to help execute one’s investment plan.

So, should you buy SLV now? Well, that all depends. Does it make sense as part of your universe? And, if it does, ask why? Make sure that you are not adding at this point because of past performance. Make sure that it is in there because you think other investors are worried about the US dollar or you think there is a chance that the Biomedical uses of silver are poised to go through the roof. In short, remember to separate the Asset Selection process from the Asset Trading process. And what happens when something better comes along in your universe? That’s easy, switch.

A Tarnished Example

Now that PIMCO has finally gotten it through to folks that, yes, they really are not keen on US Government paper (no link…too many choices), let’s look at how two bellwethers fared in the Fund King System.

TLT (which tracks 20 year plus US Treasuries) has been at or near the bottom of the US Sector ETF Universe since the beginning of November 2010. And less long term TLH (tracking 10-20 year Treasuries) has joined the bottom of the pile in another ETF portfolio since the end of November.

So, whether you were in the “Don’t Fight the Fed” or “Hyperinflation Around the Corner” camp, the Fund King System told you to steer clear of the asset class for the last three months. Even the FED could not buy up enough long dated Treasuries to keep TLT from dropping 10% over the period. Mr. Gross, the head of PIMCO noted in his newsletter that the FED has been buying as much as 70% of the newly issued Treasuries of late.

What does it mean?

There is nothing wrong with SLV , TLT or TLH in absolute terms. Each of these ETFs represents claims on perfectly good assets. The deep meaning to take away from these two examples is that it does not pay to fight the trends. If investors (on balance) are shifting money out of US Treasuries and into hard assets like Silver, there is little point in trying to stand in the way. At some point, the tides of money will change directions and other asset classes will get swept up or down. When interest rates rise a couple hundred basis points, Bill Gross and his PIMCO colleagues will be back on the bid side. Why? Because they are in the business to make money; and money is made by buying low and selling high.

An interesting read

Supporters of Ron Paul can sometimes be a prickly bunch. But, they occasionally come up with very thought provoking concepts.

I like a good bash so when I came across an article entitled: “How to End the Federal Reserve System” by Gary North, I was prepared for a rehash of the old arguments about an evil cabal on Jekyll Island in 1910. But the real strength of the article comes about halfway through when Mr. North analyzes the demise of a government agency which had also been granted monopoly powers: the US Postal Service. He draws some interesting parallels about what technology could do to the Federal Reserve System long before Ron Paul and his supporters in Congress are able to rescind the Fed’s legal mandate.

Basically, the ability to move into other currencies with a few well place computer key strokes or even to develop new mediums of exchange means that even an institution as powerful and influential as the Federal Reserve is not immune from obsolescence.

Part of the appeal of ETFs like GLD and SLV is that they are theoretically redeemable into a fixed amount of Gold and Silver respectively. While pitched as a new idea, the concept of convertibility into precious metals was once the cornerstone of the US dollar’s value (and most other currencies before that). In an interconnected world that can work with services like PayPal, it’s probably only a matter of time before someone reinvents a multinational global fractional banking and payment system backed by gold, silver or some other store of value. If it is tied into Visa, Mastercard and American Express, one need not worry about carrying about sacks of heavy metal to the grocery store. Just as email eclipsed the first class letter (something that was unthinkable as recently as 20 years ago), there is a risk of a new currency system taking the premier spot occupied by the US dollar today.

Just because the risk exists, however, does not mean it will come to pass. The biggest difference between the US Post Office and the Federal Reserve is that the latter is a privately owned, profit seeking entity. Long before we are all paid in PayPal credits or Googles, the Federal Reserve (which is owned by and represents the largest US banks) will feel compelled to take steps to shore up the value of the US dollar. That more than anything else will lead to a change in policy that will likely see higher interest rates in the not too distant future.

While you are pondering your long term investment strategy, make sure to include a plan for higher interest rates.

What happens to Japan now?

The earthquake and tsunami that hit Japan on Friday will impact the country and the economy in ways that are hard to foresee at the moment. Despite the shocking video and photos, however, the natural disasters are unlikely to have a significant long term impact on the economy. As long as the authorities can keep the nuclear fallout to a minimum, the biggest issue will be reconstruction and who will buy the fresh batch of JGBs. That points to another force for higher than near zero interest rates in the world’s #3 economy.

From an investors’ point of view, the Nikkei 225 was the best of a weak bunch (Asia has lagged since November of last year) in our universe of 11 Asian indices as of Friday’s rankings. The earthquake and tsunami do not significantly change the long term public finance fundamentals of the country and most of the familiar exporting names have transferred significant portions of their manufacturing base to locations around the world in the last few decades.

Should you buy? If your universe is only Asian Equities: then perhaps. But, if you are looking at a broader range of asset classes, there are quite a few commodity based ones that look more attractive. As Japan is import dependent for almost all of its commodity needs, there are better places to invest your money.

Catalyst Free…for a little while

The markets, like a finely tuned Italian sports car, not only make a lot of noise but need lots of love and attention. They also tend to spend a fair amount of time in the shop costing us money. We certainly saw lots of love and attention in the past few weeks as excitement built ahead of the US mid-term elections and the second round of quantitative easing (QE2).

Now that those events are in the past, the markets are left to digest the cold leftovers (a smaller than expected QE2 and the realization that the same old Congress will be around for a few more weeks). It doesn’t help that the BLS appeared to fiddle with the figures ahead of the last release, resulting in a “positive surprise” that seemed more than a bit empty. If you want to explore BLS figures, I recommend Mr. Mauldin’s column for a first brush and Shadow Government Statistics if you want to get your hands dirty with the details.

The next catalyst, which has a very good chance, is the extension of the Bush Tax Cuts. With State Governments cutting back expenditures, President Obama would only be shooting himself in his “2012 re-election campaign” foot if he were to further tighten fiscally by allowing federal income taxes to rise in the New Year. Will all the “Bush cuts” survive (ie. for those making more than $250k)? That is probably the only drama left in this upcoming catalyst. How long will this one last? Don’t be surprised if we are still talking about it in February.

So, what are the various “Systems” telling us?

From a Global Perspective, there is a preference for India, Metals (both precious, SLV, and industrial) and Emerging Markets. Fixed income, in all its flavors, has fully yielded the field to equities. In the US Sector portfolio, the Materials (XLB), Consumer Discretionary (XLY) and Q’s (QQQQ) are slightly ahead of the pack but with readings that don’t inspire tremendous confidence. On our short term commodity screen, Silver (SLV) has overtaken Sugar (SGG) and US Gasoline (UGA) has put in strong #3 showing which might be worth digging into (as the summer driving season is well past). In other portfolios, we see Non-US Properties (RWX) and Non-Japan Asia (EPP) still showing strength, most likely in expectation of receiving some of those still inflationary QE2 dollars.

SAweek00 Catalyst Free…for a little while

A Portfolio Story

In order to make the Fund King System more accessible, we have started a blog series on the Seeking Alpha website which will track the fortunes of a 20 ETF universe. The portfolio starts with $30,000 and will be buying into the top three ETFs in that system (TUR, EWH and EPI) today. If you want to follow the blog posts, start here. If you want to follow the Seeking Alpha ETF Portfolio System, we have set up a separate page here.

Instructions for Portfolio Select and Portfolio Management

We are putting the finishing touches on the much promised instructions for using our new features. The video should be ready today and we will post the link on the front page, as a separate item on the Facebook page and in the main blog. Thank you for your patience.

A Nostalgic Story about Silver

I have thoroughly enjoyed all the conspiracy theories swirling around Silver, JP Morgan and its biggest ETF, SLV over the last few weeks.

When I was a young runner on Wall Street (back when stocks and bonds were printed on real paper), I took my outstandingly huge wages (I was 14 at the time) and bought shiny one ounce bars of silver for between 6 and 10 bucks a pop at a bullion dealer just off Broadway. I had amassed around 20 to 25 of them by the end of the summer and put them in box at the bottom of my closet. Less than a year later (it might have even been as soon as Thanksgiving vacation), my parents were taking the nice silver out of the drawers and locking it away. The Hunt Brothers had struck, driving silver well past $40 an ounce (and kicking off a rash of burglaries aimed at Grandma’s silver). My Dad gave me a look that said: “Don’t be greedy.” I was nearly mobbed at the bullion dealer on Broadway when I cashed in my small hoard of shiny silver bars. I held on to two or three (and watched them go back to $5 an ounce while they oxidized) but the lesson of “Sell High” stuck. For a while, I was one wealthy teenager!

So, could there be some fun and games going on in the Silver market? I wouldn’t bet against it! A lot of rotten ideas from the 70’s and early 80’s seem to be coming back into fashion. Where did I put those old ties?

Is China A Short?

Despite all the positive press that China’s “Economic Rising” has garnered lately, investing in China has been a slog since August of last year. As one can see from the chart of the Shanghai composite below, China’s equity markets have been pretty sloppy since last August. China shares are not particularly cheap with most consensus forecasts suggesting P/E’s in the mid 20’s for a slice of the action.

From the System’s point of view, the high volatility and lack of upward direction has relegated China assets to the bottom half of the rankings for all the portfolios that include China for several months. However, after losing 13 plus percent in a month, China this week has tipped into the Short column in our Asian Index Long Short portfolio.

Shanghai Is China A Short?

Source: Bloomberg

Why is this happening when the press reports are in near universal awe of China’s ability to navigate through the Global Financial Crisis? China, after all was swift to turn on the liquidity pumps at the banks to inflate a property bubble of impressive proportions. Despite the continued weakness in China’s primary export markets of the US and Europe, companies were eventually compelled to restock shelves in the past few quarters leading to a nice snapback in export orders.

But the markets are forward looking and if one scratches beneath the veneer of good news, there are problems a plenty. The largest problems are tied to inflationary pressures (primarily from an overheated property market) and the sustainability of economic recovery in China’s two biggest export markets (the US and Europe). But the latest drop appears to be anticipating something more specific. China’s banks have all been ordered to raise more capital (slowing down loan growth is not really an option) and China’s Agricultural Bank is slated to become the largest IPO ever at US$20-30bn. The initial idea is a dual listing in Hong Kong and Shanghai in July but over the past few sessions, there has been enough talk about Plan “B”s to suggest a bit of indigestion ahead. A shaky launch could be the catalyst to send China shares into a swoon (with impact on the Hong Kong market in general).

So what is the bet?

Defining what you are trading on is very important because there can be several outcomes. If you are unclear about the original conditions, it is unlikely that you will be able to react properly to the outcomes. The bet is that China’s regulatory officials feel comfortable pushing ahead with the Agricultural Bank IPO and other fund raising activities at a time when international appetite for risk is waning. That doesn’t mean the IPO has to fail miserably or even get launched at all. It means that the presence of the deal (the overhang) will cause indigestion in the market and cause prices to fall. Why are the Chinese authorities feeling confident? For one thing, property prices are rising in double digits in almost all the cities. For another, China’s leaders are busy trying to batten down talk of the “Beijing Consensus” or “China Model” as they swan around the world with a bit of a G2 swagger. In short, the bet is about a bit of hubris in the market which will be corrected in the time honored fashion of falling prices.

How to play this opportunity?

For the average investor, it is quite difficult to short the market. Products do exist. Proshares offers YXI and FXP, the inverse and double inverse of the FTSE Xinhua 25 index, FXI. However, one should read the well written and un-camouflaged health warning on the Proshares site carefully. Because the inverse ETFs are designed to track one day movements in the underlying index, a volatile market like China can lead to large tracking errors between the ETF and the target index over relatively short stretches of time. Some investors will choose to short FXI in a margin account to try to obtain a better tracking over periods of one month or so.

Should you play this opportunity?

If you decide to short anything, you need to pay closer attention to it than a long trade. For many investors, the extra attention to detail is the dealbreaker. If you are not sure, err on the side of caution. If you are ready to play, you first need to consider how FXI will diverge from SSEC (the Shanghai composite index). While it is true that the FXI is made up of the bluer chip companies that are able to meet Hong Kong’s listing standards and that the P/E ratio is lower (16.7 at the end of April) than those in Shanghai, the FXI is heavily weighted in precisely the same financials that will be impacted by a less than stellar Agricultural Bank launch.

For those who are unwilling or unprepared to go short, there is still a good opportunity on the long side. If IPO indigestion tanks the market, there will be a good chance to pick up shares in the second largest economy (and largest exporter) on the cheap. When will that happen? Watch the System rankings in the coming months. When China starts to move off the bottom of the list, there may be a good opportunity to catch a rebound. Why do we think there will be a rebound on the other side? Because our central investment premise is that markets move in cycles. If this cycle is a down one for China, it makes sense that the next one will move in the opposite direction.

Not perfectly correlated

ShanghaiFXI Is China A Short?

Price Source: Reuters

Other trades this week

Not a lot has changed from last week. Emerging Europe, Japan, India, US Small Caps, Biotech and High Yield are still hanging in there. One subsector which has scored well lately is the Homebuilders (XHB) in the US. Homebuilders are reported optimistic despite phased out government incentives to new home buyers. In our commodities only ETF portfolio, Gold (GLD) and Silver (SLV) shine in an otherwise dull clutch of investment opportunities. However, in mixed portfolios, neither precious metal ranks highly.